Those who believe in judicial supremacy suppose that the judicial power of the United States Supreme Court allows its opinions to impose its own interpretation of state statutes on a state. In other words, instead of simply holding a statute unconstitutional (which it certainly has the power to do), the opinion of the Supreme Court explaining its judgment can create a de facto amendment to a state statute without the necessity of any action by the state legislature or a state court.

Do you agree with FACT and others that federalism prohibits the Supreme Court from telling states how they must interpret their own statutes after and in light of one of its rulings?